China Installed More Solar Panels Last Year Than the U.S. Has in Total::China installed more new solar capacity last year than the total amount ever installed in any other country.

    • Nesola@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      That is producing for the rest of the world and especially for the west. It’s hypocritical to blame china while buying stuff that had to be cheaper and cheaper.

      • RememberTheApollo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, it’s not hypocritical. Yes, anyone with half a brain knows China makes a huge chunk of the world’s stuff.

        A nation can make choices as to what energy sources they use and China went balls to the wall with coal. That wasn’t a choice the buyers of Chinese products made.

      • Gigan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t think that absolves China of any blame. They’re still choosing to produce cheap goods at the expense of the planet, because it’s good business for them too.

        • essteeyou@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          If not them then it’d be someone else. Clearly they’re starting to take polluting seriously.

          If you look at CO2 emissions per capita then China is actually doing better than countries like Canada, the US, and Singapore. Assuming I haven’t completely misread that table.

          • wikibot@lemmy.worldB
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

            This is a list of sovereign states and territories by per capita carbon dioxide emissions due to certain forms of human activity, based on the EDGAR database created by European Commission. The following table lists the 1970, 1990, 2005, 2017 and 2022 annual per capita CO2 emissions estimates (in kilotons of CO2 per year). The data only consider carbon dioxide emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and cement manufacture, but not emissions from land use, land-use change and forestry Over the last 150 years, estimated cumulative emissions from land use and land-use change represent approximately one-third of total cumulative anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Emissions from international shipping or bunker fuels are also not included in national figures, which can make a large difference for small countries with important ports. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report finds that the “Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU)” sector on average, accounted for 13-21% of global total anthropogenic GHG emissions in the period 2010–2019.

            to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about

    • angrymouse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Actually they are poluting for you to buy your stuff cheaper, who is responsible for the polution of your stuff? Dowa not make any sense to blame them for factories that the west choosed to put there.

    • Rooter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      87% of China’s energy comes from non renewable and they aren’t one of the most polluting. They ARE the most polluted country on the planet.

      And saying China leads the way is bogus. Per capita for renewable they are one of the worst.

      Saying China made the most solar panels is bullshit when they have over a billion people, the USA is actually far ahead of China when it comes to renewable energy.

      I expect nothing less from a news site that has been caught multiple times in the past for spouting pseudoscience.

  • psychothumbs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fantastic. Remember guys, we’re all on the same side on this one. This should be a signal for the US to get its ass in gear to do the same, but it’s not like China expanding its renewable energy capacity is anything but great for everyone.

  • Altofaltception@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    There’s a reason the US is targeting China from various fronts (trade restrictions, sanctions, etc.). China is a powerhouse and the US is terrified of being left behind.

    • sir_reginald@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I don’t get why you’re getting dowvoted. I guess there are a lot of Americans over here. But your statement is absolutely true. The US attempts at restricting China’s access to various technologies only make sense if they feel threatened by them.

      • wikibot@lemmy.worldB
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

        The Thucydides Trap, or Thucydides’ Trap, is a term popularized by American political scientist Graham T. Allison to describe an apparent tendency towards war when an emerging power threatens to displace an existing great power as a regional or international hegemon. The term exploded in popularity in 2015 and primarily applies to analysis of China–United States relations. Supporting the thesis, Allison led a study at Harvard University’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs which found that, among a sample of 16 historical instances of an emerging power rivaling a ruling power, 12 ended in war. That study, however, has come under considerable criticism, and scholarly opinion on the value of the Thucydides Trap concept—particularly as it relates to a potential military conflict between the United States and China—remains divided.

        to opt out, pm me ‘optout’. article | about

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    You can thank conservatives for that. They are beholden to fossil fuel interests so they attack everything else whether it be solar energy or ev

  • Skkorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    China’s govt has been trying to make their country as self sustaining as possible, this is part of that initiative. No one can tell you shit if you’re don’t rely on anyone for external things.

    • SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ya, it makes sense considering China imports 2/3 of their oil. Solar and EVs make a lot of sense when you don’t have much in the way of fossil fuels. Not even considering the environmental benefits

  • من البحر إلى النهر@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The rise of China is democratizing access to technology. My home government, supposedly a longtime partner of the US even doing its dirty work in Yemen, has struggled for years to get any tech transfer deal with the US, too many hoops to jump through. But were able to get many tech transfers from China recently. It was a major win and that technology includes solar panel manufacturing.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Too many hoops, like stop funding the terrorist groups that attacked The US on 9/11? Yeah, I can see how MBS might have some trust issues coming from The US.

      • من البحر إلى النهر@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Funny you accuse the Saudi government of what was an inside-job. The Saudi government exiled Bin Laden in the 1990s, revoking his citizenship, while the US was still working with him. Either way we don’t need it from you. China is making you irrelevant. You can’t withhold technology to bully the rest of the world. You can go pound sand.

        Also funny coming from a nation where a genocidal maniac is the lesser evil, someone who is bypassing Congress to send weapons to Israel and bomb Yemen. You keep your electoralism, and I am keeping our free healthcare, free universities and high speed rail.

        FYI, the US is guilty of multiple war crimes in Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere. They are guilty right now of war crimes in Palestine. It is really tiring how you pretend to be the good guys. You are Homelander not Superman, and you are no longer the only player in town.

        • Sarmyth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Bro… the current leadership of China committed genocide on their own soil and have been attempting to expand their borders for decades.

          China is not a good partner for playing the lesser of 2 evils game. You’d be at it all day with the whataboutism.

        • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Shit were guilty of war crimes inside the US. Tell me something I don’t know.

          Thing is our government occasionally fucks up and does some good shit. MBS, and Ji Jinpooh don’t give two fucks about their own people or any others.

          MBS is still funding terrorist groups 24 years later, and murdering journalists.

          The US Government may be a soulless corporate structure bent on enriching itself. MBS is a parochial dictator that is just pissed off we don’t need his dino juice anymore.

  • Sanctus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Its because China isn’t beholden to a bunch of invisible suits demanding money over all else. Apparently the US can’t break from Citizens United, and tell this corpos whats what to literally save its own skin.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    China doesn’t have oil and they want to be energy independent. Because of this they heavily invest in renewables.

    It’s not like they are doing it to save the planet, but it does save the planet.

    • hark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      US total wealth: 139+ trillion (in USD)

      China total wealth: 84+ trillion (in USD)

      It’s not a function of population. It’s a function of wealth and the will to use that wealth to invest in clean energy. The US has entrenched interests in keeping the oil flowing. China isn’t investing in clean energy for altruism, they do it because they don’t have rich reserves of oil, but at least they’re doing the right thing, even if it’s not necessarily for the right reasons.

      • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Agreed that wealth also is a relevant parameter. But it is also a function of the population because what fraction of your population’s power consumption is coming from a renewable source is a more interesting metric than your raw renewable power production.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          global production is all outsourced to india and mainly china.

          their carbon emissions correspond not only to their own population, but to produce goods for most of the world.

          • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            yes and hence why it is currently only reasonable to compare things like total renewable energy production vs total household energy requirements of a country. production energy is too global to tackle with this approach. and so why I just casually mentioned population is an important factor in how much renewable energy you should be producing.

            • umbrella@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              yes, thats true, but the original point is that china has to invest heavily in energy solely because of its population, and thats not true when most of that consumption comes from globalized industry working there. that was my point.

  • randon31415@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Building giant empty cities in the middle of nowhere doesn’t help the housing crisis in China.

    Building giant solar and wind farms in the middle of nowhere does help with the pollution crisis.

    Glad that they finally found something that uses dumping money in the middle of nowhere that can actually improve peoples lives instead of just prop up an economic bubble.

  • occhionaut@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    This was done with the express purpose of having the title of it. Its a vanity project that wont last 10 years.