• Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    This will be as effective as the do not call registry and CAN-SPAM. Which is to say, it will be a sick joke that won’t do shit by design.

    • officermike@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Because there are legitimate reasons for some robo calls. Appointment reminders and confirmations, school weather closure announcements, two-factor login verification, etc.

      • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        It would be a good trade. Lose the few semi-useful legitimate ones to get rid of the overwhelming majority which are malicious scammers and conservative dickbags.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        No there isn’t.

        Text if school is cancelled. Throw 2fa out the window. Phone numbers are not identity. Text appointment reminders. Literally nothing needs a robo voice that isn’t better as text.

  • reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fine? They will be happy to pay the fine if it means they can fool thousands of voters.

    Fines aren’t enough for this kind of behavior.

    • Poach@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Unfortunately, the FCC probably doesn’t have the power to do much more than fine them. It would probably take congress to pass a bill to have jail time or something.

      I’m purely guessing though

      Reading the article, it sounds like the FCC has enforced similar stuff before. And at up to a $23,000 fine it could add up quickly. And the precedent of previous large fines makes me think this might actually have some teeth.

  • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    But deceiving people for money is fine? Why this one stipulation? Should just be outright illegal to use deep fake anything to deceive for personal gain, profit, or to hurt others.

  • just_change_it@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    “This infringes on advertisers constitutional right to deceive the public for personal gain based on our historical tradition of fucking the average american”-US Supreme Court Conservatives.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Oooh that mighty governmental watchdog the FCC?! Oh man, that’s some serious stuff. The only group more deadly serious than the FCC is the FEC. Now those guys you can’t even look at sideways before they take you down.

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Robo-callers usually don’t care at all what the law says. This law will do almost nothing. But it’s the thought that counts.