The blue LED was supposed to be impossible—until a young engineer proposed a moonshot idea.

  • sebinspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    10 months ago

    Really annoying that the company shat on him for years, and continued to do so after he multiplied the value of the company. Toxic behavior.

  • Dmian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The blue led was released in 1993. I remember reading an article in Wired magazine (back when magazines were published on paper) about the invention. Gladly, the article is still available online: https://www.wired.com/1995/03/blue-laser/

    I talked with some friends about the “true boo-roo” led, and the phrase stuck with us (that’s why I still remember the article). At the time (almost 30 years ago) we had no idea how important the invention was, even when we realized that it allowed for rgb led light.

    But we had no idea leds would be miniaturized to be used in screens and be as ubiquitous as they are today. Living through all this technology evolution has been quite the ride.

  • Clent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    Excellent counter example to anyone claiming that we need patent and copyright to innovate.

    This man made nothing on his invention and was not motivated by money but fame.

    There are endless of examples of how those who do things for money hold back the creativity that leads to innovation. This is one of them. It almost didn’t happen because his pursuit was not seen as profitable.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      This man made nothing on his invention and was not motivated by money but fame.

      And then he sued the company for $20 million because the CEO didn’t want to respect his efforts and stiffed him.

      • Clent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        And the amount he actually won only covered the legal fees, so he made nothing.

        • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          And if he had been granted a patent for his invention, he would have been fairly compensated for his work by being able to license production to companies that had the means to make them at scale. OP seems to think this scenario is an example of how patents should be abolished, but it’s a perfect example of why we have them in the first place. And that reason is so that rich people don’t fuck over comparatively poor inventors.

          • Clent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Your cognitive dissonance is why we cannot improve this system. Patents cannot both be responsible for his lack of profit from his invention and how he would have been fairly compensated.

            Patents do exists and we was not fairly compensated, therefore patent do not solve their intended problem.

            We live in this reality. Not whatever rose colored version you think could exist if we just get the correct tweaks in place.

            At some point we need to stop trying to adapt the concepts people came up with hundreds of years ago. Created in a world that no longer resembles our own.

            Consider how contentious the issue was that they redefined to included it in the constitution. The consider what other contentious issues were also included in that same document, i.e. the three fifths compromise.

            • Atemu@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Parents do exists

              Phew, was scared there for a second.

  • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    My favorite thing about widely-available blue LEDs was the effect on TV scifi.

    Watch the Star Trek shows made in the 1980s and 1990s and the tricorders, alien gadgets, and other props were always twinkling with red, yellow, and green LEDs to look futuristic. A generation later and every single hand prop on 2000s Doctor Who, Torchwood, etc. glowed and twinkled blue because the LEDs had just become cheap enough for prop makers, but weren’t yet widespread in day-to-day life so the viewers were seeing something strange and unusual.

    Now every color of LED imaginable is just common and whatever, but for a good stretch of time glowy blue became the standard “scifi” color just because that particular tech happened to turn up at that particular time.

    • T156@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I’m not sure that LEDs were the thing that kicked off the trend. They made it easier to implement, but even in the 80s and 90s, you had things like Tron that might have kicked off the futuristic look with neon lines/tubes.

  • JATth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    10 months ago

    This was an yet another glorious episode from veritasium.

    I hope we get well past UVC LEDs. (i.e., shorter wavelengths) UV LEDs are already available. Unfortunately, this progress will stop before X-ray light. With +1 KeV energy, you pretty much must blast off the electrons from the atoms to emit X-rays, which an x-ray tube already does. Or by peeling off a piece of scotch tape.

  • Damdy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    10 months ago

    Haven’t watch the video yet, but I remember how impressed my step dad was with the blue LED when we got our PlayStation 2. I was like, yeah great whatever let’s play games, at the time.

  • Clanket@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 months ago

    That was an excellent watch, thanks for sharing.

    YouTube is horrendous for ads though.

  • aeharding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Samsung (etc) caught with their pants down

    It makes you wonder how much longer it would take to commercialize blue LEDs without his contributions.

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    If it was so hard to make the first one that hundreds of researchers couldn’t do it for years… then how is it so cheap and easy to do today?