Zoom Changes TOS to Say It Won’t Train AI on Your Calls ‘Without Your Consent’ After Backlash::Zoom added a line to its terms of use on Monday, after concerns that the company was using calls to train artificial intelligence algorithms went viral.

  • Metal Zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are we really letting companies get away with “better to ask for forgiveness, than permission”?

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    The added line to their TOS doesn’t block anything anyone was concerned about. It says they won’t train their own models without consent (which you give by using any A.I. feature or joining a meeting where the presenter uses A.I. features).

    But what people are worried about is them licensing conversations to others for A.I. training. Many Zoom calls are one to many presentations but a lot more are private conversations with insider info, trade secrets, PII, legally protected data (like a healthcare record in the US), etc. Zoom is reserving the right to do whatever the fuck they want with recorded meetings.

    Section 10.4 of the TOS is the issue. Most people don’t care if they use data internally to build features. Lots of people care if they share private meetings with third parties.

    • KIM_JONG_JUICEBOX@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It seems like collecting a lot of the data you mention would be illegal. Even if they add it to their TOS, that still doesn’t make it legal.

      Like I can’t make a TOS that says I can kill you, and then I can legally get away with murder.

  • Kansses@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think soon they will have systems in place to cillect data by concent. And then secretly will train their ai anyway. Whose going to punish them. Nobody.

  • rustyricotta@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the point of talking about consent in a TOS that you have to “Accept and Agree” to in order to use the service. Odds are that that’s enough consent for them.