Rock and Stone!
DRG is always there for me if I get tired of other games. I’m a Scout main because I like flying around like Titanfall. There’s a build that raises single shot weak spot damage to deadly levels. It’s a blast bunny-hopping around praetorians and killing them in 2 shots.
I’m here. I don’t know if it has changed since I was a child or if I just didn’t notice, but the cream is disgusting. It’s mostly just palm/canola oil.
I don’t dislike the cookie part. It’s not to die for, but it is a classic flavor that tastes great in milkshakes.
The facts became so undeniable that they’re forced to accept that things are changing, but now they insist that the changes are absolutely not related to our environmental fuckery but are a natural thing.
I have no idea what’s said in the article due it’s bs subscribe wall.
If you are actually interested in the topic, you can check out RepRap. The most popular of which I’m sure you’ve heard of are the various Prusas, which are popular because it’s also sold prebuilt.
I’ve always wanted to build the FoldaRap due to how small it becomes when you fold it down.
I’ve been playing Hades again. I played it a while back, but only had like 30 attempts and 3 successes. The hype of the 64 heat run and the sequel coming soon got me back into it to hopefully finish the game.
If you’re a fan of the Stein’s;Gate anime, the visual novel has many more great unique scenes and mini arcs that got cut from the show. It is a very long play time though.
What’s the point of talking about consent in a TOS that you have to “Accept and Agree” to in order to use the service. Odds are that that’s enough consent for them.
A bit different from the question but
Outer Wilds.
I’ve spent a lot of time in it and have 100% it, so it’s hard to find a reason get back in, but even just booting to the title screen just completely transports me.
Why? Outer Wilds was just an incredible experience, and the OST is astounding and the music completely soaked up the experience and can bring it all back just by listening.
If you are a fan of the first one, and have time to spare time you should still play it. But know that it’s missing a lot of the magic.
I think there was mention of a Japanese school as well.
If you had read even the first sentence of the article, you might’ve learned that just maybe they have a reason to not use land.
Not enough land.
Not every place is like central Africa or Ohio. Basically all coastal regions near the equator (which are the only places they are recommending this) are densely populated. To get the amount of solar panels they suggest, you would have to go far inland (if there is any inland) and have many more much smaller solar plants, and that’s more maintenance than single giant solar field, though as you’ve said, I’m sure on the sea comes with it’s own maintenance problems.
The article also talks about waves, wind and other environmental affects, and shows all the places where the “defences” against the environment wouldn’t have to be strong or expensive.
They most definitely don’t suggest that this be used everywhere. The main example they talked about is Indonesia. Extremely densely populated with little suitable land for solar plants.
TLDR: In most places this is stupid… but they never suggested that. There are certain places where it is viable and possibly the only option for large solar farms.
I was wondering the same thing. Just considering algae, it absorbs a large portion of the world’s CO2. But the ocean is massive and a relatively tiny covered patch wouldn’t dent it much.
Add the fact that the solar panels would negate some of the need to burn fossil fuels, I think the outcome is more than net positive.
As far as any negative impact on wildlife and the biosphere, I’m sure it’s negative, but I don’t know much about it.
Science compels us to explode the sun.