Trust in AI technology and the companies that develop it is dropping, in both the U.S. and around the world, according to new data from Edelman shared first with Axios.

Why it matters: The move comes as regulators around the world are deciding what rules should apply to the fast-growing industry. “Trust is the currency of the AI era, yet, as it stands, our innovation account is dangerously overdrawn,” Edelman global technology chair Justin Westcott told Axios in an email. “Companies must move beyond the mere mechanics of AI to address its true cost and value — the ‘why’ and ‘for whom.’”

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    I mean, the thing we call “AI” now-a-days is basically just a spell-checker on steroids. There’s nothing to really to trust or distrust about the tool specifically. It can be used in stupid or nefarious ways, but so can anything else.

    • reflectedodds@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      9 months ago

      Took a look and the article title is misleading. It says nothing about trust in the technology and only talks about not trusting companies collecting our data. So really nothing new.

      Personally I want to use the tech more, but I get nervous that it’s going to bullshit me/tell me the wrong thing and I’ll believe it.

    • SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      “Trust in AI” is layperson for “believe the technology is as capable as it is promised to be”. This has nothing to do with stupidity or nefariousness.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      basically just a spell-checker on steroids.

      I cannot process this idea of downplaying this technology like this. It does not matter that it’s not true intelligence. And why would it?

      If it is convincing to most people that information was learned and repeated, that’s smarter than like half of all currently living humans. And it is convincing.

    • Politically Incorrect@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      ThE aI wIlL AttAcK HumaNs!! sKynEt!!

      Edit: These “AI” can even make a decent waffles recipe and “it will eradicate humankind”… for the gods sake!!

      It even isn’t AI at all, just how corps named it Is clickbait.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        AI is just a very generic term and always has been. It’s like saying “transportation equipment” which can be anything from roller skates to the space shuttle". Even the old checkers programs were describes as AI in the fifties.

        Of course a vague term is a marketeer’s dream to exploit.

        At least with self driving cars you have levels of autonomy.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Before chatgpt was revealed, this was under the unbrella of what AI meant. I prefer to use established terms. Don’t change the terms just because you want them to mean something else.