Key points:

  • Cara’s Rapid Growth: The app gained 600,000 users in a week

  • Artists Leaving Instagram: The controversy around Instagram using images to train AI led many artists to seek an alternative

  • Cara’s Features: The app is designed specifically for artists and offers a ‘Portfolio’ feature. Users can tag fields, mediums, project types, categories, and software used to create their work

  • While Cara has grown quickly, it is still tiny compared to Instagram’s massive user base of two billion.

  • Glaze Integration: Cara is working on integrating Glaze directly in the app to provide users with an easy way to protect their work from be used by any AI

more about: https://blog.cara.app/blog/cara-glaze-about

  • doodledup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    I don’t understand how this Glaze thing is supposed to stop AI being trained on the art.

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      It’s not. It’s supposed to target certain open source AIs (Stable Diffusion specifically).

      Latent diffusion models work on compressed images. That takes less resources. The compression is handled by a type of AI called VAE. For this attack to work, you must have access to the specific VAE that you are targeting.

      The image is subtly altered so that the compressed image looks completely different from the original. You can only do that if you know what the compression AI does. Stable Diffusion is a necessary part of the Glaze software. It is ineffective against any closed source image generators that have trained their own VAE (or equivalent).

      This kind of attack is notoriously fickle and thwarted by even small changes. It’s probably not even very effective against the intended target.

      If you’re all about intellectual property, it kinda makes sense that freely shared AI is your main enemy.

    • Etterra@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      It pollutes the data pool. The rule of gigo (garbage in garbage out) is used to garbage the AI results.

      Basically, it puts some imperceptible stuff in the image file’s data (somebody else should explain how because I don’t know) so that what the AI sees and the human looking at the picture sees are rather different. So you try and train it to draw a photorealistic car and instead it creates a lumpy weird face or something. Then the AI uses that defective nonsense to learn what “photorealistic car” means and reproduce it - badly.

      If you feed a bunch of this trash into an AI and tell it that this is how to paint like, say, Rembrandt, and then somebody uses it to try to paint a picture like Rembrandt, they’ll end up getting something that looks like it was scrawled by a 10-year-old, or the dogs playing poker went through a teleporter malfunction, or whatever nonsense data was fed into the AI instead.

      If you tell an AI that 2+2=🥔, that pi=9, or that the speed of light is Kevin, then nobody can use that AI to do math.

      If you trained Chat GPT to explain history by feeding it descriptions of games of Civ6 them nobody could use it to cheat on their history term paper. The AI would go on about how Gandhi attacked Mansa Musa in 1686 with all out nuclear war. It’s the same thing here, but with pictures.

      • egeres@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Right but, AFAIK glaze is targeting the CLIP model inside diffusion models, which means any new versions of CLIP would remove the effect of the protection