Ex-Tesla employee reveals shocking details on worker conditions: ‘You get fired on the spot.’::Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s ‘ultra hardcore’ work culture is revealed to have led to long hours, unsafe conditions, and harassment for employees.

  • Disgusted_Tadpole@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a western European, to me the problem isn’t that they’re fired on the spot, but that a company can actually do that. You guys should’ve fought for your rights.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Welcome to ‘at-will employment’ America, where you can fire anyone for any reason as long as they can’t prove it was because you are one of the protected classes under the Civil Rights Act (does not include LGBT+ people). They can literally fire you because they don’t like your ears.

        • DulyNoted@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Are you comparing an intentional political stance that someone (hopefully) reasoned themselves into as equally inescapable of the colour of one’s skin, or sexual orientation?

          Crazy thought, if you’re getting put on blast due to your political views you absolutely do not need to continue sharing them with the class.

          • Deftdrummer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You’re right perhaps you shouldn’t have all of media running interference for you and your ilk.

            Let me get this right so you feel that it’s appropriate to discriminate in the workplace based on political views? You would.

            • DulyNoted@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, I think if your political views are actively hurting someone or advocating for harm to a group of people then you should be held responsible for the shit that comes out of your own mouth.

              This is not even remotely comparable to being unable to fire someone just because they’re black, or gay, or a woman.

      • SeatBeeSate@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not to mention protesting likely means becoming homeless. It means losing insurance, it means losing you car insurance and likely paying a hefty premium when you can get it again. It means losing access to food, Healthcare. It means risking being barred from future employment.

        So let’s vote? Well turns out your district is shaped like a contorted snake, and unless you convince 60% of people who will vote for any loony who hates the same people they do, to help their neighbor for once, well you’re SOL.

        • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Leaving your job doesn’t automatically mean becoming homeless and starving. That is a pretty extreme and unrealistic stance.

          • bitsplease@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            1 year ago

            When 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck (by design) it really does.

            How do you propose they make rent the next month with no money?

          • DulyNoted@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            Isn’t something like 50% of the US workforce paycheck to paycheck? That’s very much by design. Look up any strikebreaking action in history, the strategy is always for businesses to see if they can hold out longer than their workers, and if they can, no concessions are necessary.

            Our stability and ability to strike is diametrically opposed to the desires of those in power. Until we get the guillotines out again, I’m not really sure how any of this could possibly change. Under capitalism, there is no incentive for it.

          • Do it out of spite.@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sadly for too many people this is the case. If you’re paycheck to paycheck losing a job could leave you chose between starving or homelessness. Not to mention how long it might that unfortunate soul to get another source of income that is enough to back to just making it. They might have to settle for lower pay.

    • nutsack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      they can’t, really. they probably see a lot of wrongful termination lawsuits, and try to settle them out of court.

    • walnutwalrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do think it’s good to create a healthy culture that respects workers, but I don’t understand why being able to fire an employee is a bad thing

      Imagine you’re not allowed to fire people you don’t like who you think are doing a bad job at work

      • Disgusted_Tadpole@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s obviously not forbidden to fire people. You just can’t do it like that, because you woke up grumpy that particular morning. Employees are highly protected in France, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be fired.

        • walnutwalrus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          You just can’t do it like that, because you woke up grumpy that particular morning

          That should be fine though, that’s freedom of association, why force people to work together who don’t want to do so?

          • Disgusted_Tadpole@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 year ago

            I personally don’t find it fine. You’re talking as if everyone is equal meanwhile, most of the time, there is a subordination. People usually don’t say “I want to work with that guy because I think he’s nice”. Sometimes it’s “I need to work anywhere because I need to feed my children and simply survive”. Those people can’t live in fear of losing their job everytime their boss has a twisted testicle, they can’t afford being jobless. Their lives depend on it.

            But it’s something quite cultural, that’s how we decided to build our society.

            It has flaws though : corporations can become quite cautious when hiring someone, making sure they fit well and won’t cause any trouble.

      • DulyNoted@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah it’s not all or nothing though. You’re acting like outside the US it’s impossible to fire people. That’s simply not even remotely true.

      • greavous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Indeed. That still happens. Just you have to have a valid reason to fire them. Not liking someone is a petty reason to fire someone. Not doing their job is another thing altogether.

        • walnutwalrus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          the “valid reason” is you don’t like them, why would we want to force people to work together who don’t like each other?

              • greavous@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                OK I’ll bite. Noone is being forced to work together. If you don’t like a colleague you can find a new job. But you can’t get someone fired just because you don’t like them, that is petty, selfish and childish. You seem to be taking extreme examples. Try looking at how the world outside America actually handles employment law before making wild assumptions that protecting employees from mini dictators means that people are forced to work together.