We need to have a law against using AI in enforcing the law.

Lol, more a hope than a plan

who are prepared to work themselves to death for peanuts

…while having no idea what they are doing

Fuck aliens

This is disrespectful towards the achievements of the human race. My father kept attributing all of our recent technology to “the findings at roswell” and i have very strong feelings towards this position.

Apparently it’s now 444B, lol

This is for models that cost 100 million dollars to train. Not all things are the same and most things that can do serious damage to big chunks of population are regulated. Cars are regulated, firearms are regulated, access to drugs is regulated. Even internet access is super controlled. I don’t see how you can say AI should not be regulated.

Seems a reasonable request. You are creating a tool with the potential to be used as a weapon, you must be able to guarantee it won’t be used as such. Power is nothing without control.

It seems very biased to say the least. A title like that would be ok if it was comparing agile to pre-existing models like waterfall. A valid title for this would have been "new sw development methodology seems to have a much lower failure rate than agile dev. "

ALSO I would like to see the experiment repeated by independent researchers.

I know but I’m sure he’s just throwing words around, what he meant is “gigafactory of COMPUTERS”

Did he just invent self-hosting?

Don’t forget also the male morning-after pill: you take it the next day, it changes your blood group

I’m sure there would be workaounds to that, also I’m not selling anything, just sharing a project and list of components. i’m not a lawyer but i’m pretty sure there’s nothing they can do to stop me

Even if what you said was true, i think the better choice would be to go in the direction of simplicity, not the direction that favours segregation.

I think it’s time for an open source 2d printer project, we have open source 3d printers and the technology is much more complex than 2d. Time to put HP to sleep

Just because you’re the CEO of a big company, it doesn’t mean you know what you’re talking about. In this case it’s clear he doesn’t. You may say “but the company makes a lot of money” and that’s not a point in his favor either, as this is a clear example of survivor bias. Coding is going nowhere and the companies laying off people are just a proof CEOs don’t know what they are doing.

For years there have been open source solutions ready for basically any purpose, and if that has not made coders useless, nothing will. Maybe they will change designation, but people that understand what’s going on at a technical level will always be necessary.

There have been some situations in the past few years that made the situation less clear-cut, but that doesn’t make coders optional.

Seven years ago I was asked to do interview with recruiter, technical screening, a take home test that took me most of a weekend, and a 3.5 hours long interview with a BE, a FE and a tech architect asking me stuff from all the stack including infrastructure and architecture, and including pair programming with yhe FE and then the BE on the project I presented. It was hard but worth it in the end, my point is the process depends on the company and there is huge variability.

AR just means augmented reality, it says nothing of how it should be implemented

Isn’t this something that could have been done with photoshop in 30 minutes? What’s the difference when the result could have been almost perfect just as easily?

Ps. Haven’t seen the images being discussed, and this is even more alarming given legislation could be passed based on images you’re not even morally allowed to review. It could all be fictional and I would never even know.

Did we really need spmeone to say this? Is it not self evident? If a company requires hybrid work for me it’s a huge red flag