Am I understanding this correctly? NOLA was arguing that, since they tax satellite radio for listeners in their city, they should be able to tax internet streams for the same listeners? If so, I feel like the two things should be comparably applicable (if it weren’t for the ITFA), but also fuck all the way off, NOLA government. Get fucked, seriously.

Hot take? This should have been a major version update.

https://semver.org/

Sounds like the foundation of the kind of thrilling story you can’t just makeup.

Sounds like yt-dlp supports BBC iPlayer downloads.

Good point in general, but, what they’re specifically talking about here (rolling codes), perhaps what they should have said is that no one can (feasibly) do it, not just that their hardware isn’t capable.

Edit: Oh, for the blocking signal, that part might be functionality that could be added, I see what I think you’re saying there. Still, that would be a step towards it, but it would still require serious hardware to crack a private key, as I understand.

“Flipper Zero can’t be used to hijack any car, specifically the ones produced after the 1990s, since their security systems have rolling codes,” Flipper Devices COO Alex Kulagin told BleepingComputer.

"Also, it’d require actively blocking the signal from the owner to catch the original signal, which Flipper Zero’s hardware is incapable of doing.

Just politicians trying to appear to be doing something so they can keep their jobs.

This is just an illustration and a claim about a trend in social media posts. Did I miss a link to an article with anything, like some supporting data?

Isn’t this just a business article?

The developers just put their own logic into its estimation software.

I wish everyone would abandon reddit because of the terrible treatment it showed its users and contributors, some of whom should be considered amongst its builders.

But news alone of a web site having an outage isn’t really a technological discussion any more than news about a traffic jam would be.

There’s one restaurant in my area that has some tables for one. I noticed that, for me, those do feel more complete when I’m dining alone. Instead of extra, conspicuously empty seats around the rest of the table, there’s a table clearly designed for one diner to just enjoy a good meal.

And it’s not enough to have tables with only one chair. If such a table is amidst larger-party tables, I think it still makes the other usual places at the table feel abnormally empty. What makes tables for one feel “right” has something to do with their placement in the restaurant (so as not to feel odd or exceptional), their orientation (so as not to face the diner towards someone else’s gaze–unless mingling is the goal), and then the size and number of seats.

It’s probably difficult for some restaurants to accommodate solo diners due to a need for density, but when a restaurant might have some space that would otherwise not be all that useful (like a little extra space between a planter divider and a walkway, where larger tables just wouldn’t fit), it is an opportunity to attract solo diners who want to enjoy the solo experience of focusing on the meal and their own thoughts rather than bar seating. (And, on that topic, I think it’s becoming more normal for people to not want alcohol displayed prominently in front of them when they’re really just looking for a nice meal.)

Wow, I saw this tech on Veritasium’s channel and wondered how long it might be before we might see it. And here it is. Just like that, a future where bike tires never go completely flat may almost be here.

Not arguing about the merits of blockchain, but if your money is in a bank, it is on a computer that depends on cryptography (TLS) for controlling access.

edit: Well, ok, at least then it’s not just crypto standing between your assets and someone else. Then there’s going to be at least another layer, like multifactor authentication, VPN/MPLS, etc., depending on the point being attacked.

Is the joke that they didn’t waste any time arming with the new tech?

Headline seems weasel-wordy.

Numerically vague expressions (for example, “some people”, “experts”, “many”, “evidence suggests”)

I.e., are most bosses doing this? 50%? 20%?

Top-to-bottom overrides, and, oh, look at that, this meme reinforced the reverse order by also setting the later comment above the earlier one.

Also extracting some key facts from the article:

… an instrument on board the International Space Station, [detected] about 1.5 metric tons per hour. There’s no indication of how long it lasted.

An air permit application filed with the TCEQ in January 2020 said the company expected to routinely dump LNG into the air to the tune of [60 tons] a year…

…a huge oilfield near the rocket site [is] thought to give off some 2.7 million tons of methane a year.

(My paraphrasing and emphasis added.)

I’m not saying one of those isn’t a lot, though I am observing that we really really really need to ramp up renewables production to offset fossil fuel demand.

Funny the different experiences we have. I switched from FF to Brave only on mobile because FF mobile doesn’t correctly interface to Android clipboard for scrolling screenshots. (I think that’s because they assume everyone uses Samsung, which brings its own, but I’m on real Android and loving the experience over Samsung’s bloaty mc bloatface experience.)

That was only one feature that I rarely use, but, once I tried to switch back to FF on mobile, I realized some other problems came back to me and were only happening on FF. Perhaps it’s one of my plugins, but every other scroll-up motion is ignored. The only reason I have plugins is to give me dark mode on accessibility-challenged sites, and that ability to do that with plugins was initially FF mobile’s edge over others, but dark mode is natively built into Brave.

I still prefer FF on desktop, and I want it to win on mobile, especially for its reading mode that I don’t think any other browser comes close to implementing.