Most of the embedded world uses those.

It’s something our business does on occasion, as well as a hobby of his.

Quick update: talked to my boss and he’ll be moving it “soon”. I think I’ll just wfh for the rest of the day.

Update 2: my boss apologized and moved the printer and resins out. 😊 I popped by after work tonight and it still smells but it’s not bad now.

I feel like most average people (regardless of age) don’t even know alternatives to internet browsers exist, so why would I expect a judge to know? They’re obviously not experts in every field, it’s up to the attorneys to inform them and persuade them one way or another.

Are people here unable to see that the layman might not know what Firefox is off-hand?

• founder has donated several thousand dollars in support of anti-gay-marriage groups
• they optionally replace ads on websites with their own ads
• they are associated with crypto schemes (like their own cryptocurrency), and previously promoted an ftx widget
• they sometimes add affiliate links to the end of urls, so they can collect revenue