Taylor Swift is living every woman’s AI porn nightmare — Deepfake nudes of the pop star are appearing all over social media. We all saw this coming.::Deepfake nudes of the pop star are appearing all over social media. We all saw this coming.

  • books@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I feel like I live on the Internet and I never see this shit. Either it doesn’t exist or I exist on a completely different plane of the net.

  • BeefPiano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    I wonder if this winds up with revenge porn no longer being a thing? Like, if someone leaks nudes of me I can just say it’s a deepfake?

    Probably a lot of pain for women from mouth breathers before we get there from here .

    • thantik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      This has already been a thing in courts with people saying that audio of them was generated using AI. It’s here to stay, and almost nothing is going to be ‘real’ anymore unless you’ve seen it directly first-hand.

    • Cheskaz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      Australia’s federal legislation making non-consensual sharing of intimate images an offense includes doctored or generated images because that’s still extremely harmful to the victim and their reputation.

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why would it make revenge porn less of a thing? Why are so many people here convinced that as long people say it’s “fake” it’s not going to negatively affect them?

      The mouth breathers will never go away. They might even use the excuse the other way around, that because someone could say just about everything is fake, then it might be real and the victim might be lying. Remember that blurry pictures of bigfoot were enough to fool a lot of people.

      Hell, even others believe it is fake, wouldn’t it still be humilliating?

      • Æther@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think you’re underestimating the potential effects of an entire society starting to distrust pictures/video. Yeah a blurry Bigfoot fooled an entire generation, but nowadays most people you talk to will say it’s doctored. Scale that up to a point where literally anyone can make completely realistic pics/vids of anything in their imagination, and have it be indistinguishable from real life? I think there’s a pretty good chance that “nope, that’s a fake picture of me” will be a believable, no question response to just about anything. It’s a problem

        • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          There are still people to believe in Bigfoot and UFOs, there’s still people falling for hoaxes every day. To the extent that distrust is spreading, it’s not manifested as widespread reasonable skepticism but the tendency to double down on what people already believe. There are more flat earthers today than there were decades ago.

          We are heading to a point that if anyone says deepfake porn is fake, regardless of reasons and arguments, people might just think it’s real just because they feel like it might be. At this point, this isn’t even a new situation. Just like people skip reputable scientific and journalistic sources in favor of random blogs that validate what they already believe, they will treat images, deepfaked or not, much in the same way.

          So, at best, some people might believe the victim regardless, but some won’t no matter what is said, and they will treat them as if those images are real.

          • daltotron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            This strikes me as correct, it’s kind of more complicated than just the blanket statement of “oh, everyone will have too calloused of a mind to believe anything ever again”. People will just try to intuit truth from surrounding context in a vacuum, much like how they do with our current every day reality where I’m really just a brain in a vat or whatever.

        • eatthecake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          I hope someone sends your mom a deepfake of you being dismembered with a rusty saw. I’m sure the horror will fade with time.

          • Æther@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            What a horrible thing to wish on a random person on the internet. Maybe take a break on being so reactionary, jesus

  • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Went to Bing and found “Taylor swift ai pictures” as a top search. LOTS of images of her being railed by Sesame Street characters

  • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    People have been doing these for years even before AGI.

    Now, it’s just faster.

    Edit: Sorry, I suppose I should mean LLM AI

  • DarkMessiah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    And this is why I don’t want to be famous. Being famous exposes your name to the crazies of the world, and leaves you blissfully unaware until the crazies snap.

  • Stanwich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    WHAT?? DISGUSTING! WHERE WOULD THESE JERKS PUT THIS ? WHAT SPECIFIC WEBSITE DO I NEED TO BOYCOTT?

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Google Search didn’t really turn up much, far less than if you were to search up something like ‘Nancy Pelosi nude’ even, it kind of seems overblown and the only reason it’s gotten any news is because of who it happened to. Just being famous nowadays seems like you’re just going to see photoshopped or deepfake porn of yourself spread all over the internet.

  • Neil@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m not saying she shouldn’t have complained about this. She has every right to, but complaining about it definitely made the problem a lot worse.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Except she’s the most famous woman in the country, a well-established sex symbol, and already the subject of enumerable erotic fantasies and fictions.

        Its the same problem as “The Fappening” from forever ago. The fact that this exists is its own fuel and whether she chooses to acknowledge it or not is a moot point. Someone is going to talk about it and the news will spread.

    • LeroyJenkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      she drew so much attention to it though that there are more news stories than actual images at this point. if you look for the images, you’re gonna have to go through pages and pages of news articles about it at this point. not sure if it was intentional, but kinda worked…

    • dlok@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is probably a good thing even if real nudes leaked nobody would know if it’s real

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    10 months ago

    Nightmare? Doesn’t it simply give them the chance to just say any naked pic of them is fake now?

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oh I’m sure that must be a very nice thing to talk out with your mother or significant other.

      “Don’t worry they are plastering naked pictures of me everywhere, it’s all fake”

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Have you met my mom? She would 100% love the fact that people are trying to see her naked.

                • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Today? I wouldn’t say that so confidently (on Lemmy even). People working in media and marketing do have to use it. Even if they aren’t in it, it doesn’t mean they are immune to such a thing happening, or that people they know won’t stumble on it.

    • Siegfried@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      An Argentine candidate got filmed while being allegedly stoned, so “someone” released an even worst video that was clearly fabricated by an AI to disprove the first one. It kind of worked

        • agitatedpotato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          In my mind I’m imagining its a video of him making a cream cheese sandwich between two strawberries pop tarts because thats how I always knew my buddy was stoned.

        • Siegfried@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Usually when you see rock flying towards someone…

          Kidding. I dont know if stoned was the right word, but he looked like* being under the influence of some substance. Then people started saying it was coke.

          Strange movements, the jaw moving periodically and in a akward position, looking very atentive with the eyes wide open… I dont have experience with anything of this and im not saying that he was under the influence of something, but those are the things that made the public opinion decide that he was doing coke.

          *according to the opinión of the populace

          Edit: we call it the Maradona stance

  • bean@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well, targeting someone famous and going overboard with it likely results in legal responses. Perhaps this gets deepfakes then attention they need to be regulated or legally punishable. Especially when targeting underage children.