• Warjac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    Headline fix: Google kills the one good thing it has going for it with AI

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      6 months ago

      Search sucks for some time now. I’d say the best thing google offers today is Gmail - but there are plenty of arguments against that too.

      • ilmagico@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        83
        ·
        6 months ago

        Google Maps, their traffic data has no rivals, unlike gmail which has plenty of good competition. It’s the one thing I couldn’t easily replace yet.

        • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 months ago

          True. I wanted to replace it with OSM or similar, but my main use of Maps after navigation is exploring places, reading reviews, and browsing pictures. They have a database that is tough to replace.

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I switched away from google maps to Apple Maps a few years ago and I honestly can’t tell any difference. If google maps traffic data is better, it’s not in any noticeable kind of way for regular day to day usage.

          • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            Honestly Apple Maps is better in my area by a decent margin. It’s up to date sooner and that matters in a rapidly growing city. Google still beats it in search but even then AM finds things it doesn’t at times. i just wish they’d move on from shitty Yelp. I vastly prefer AMs navigation over GM as well.

          • ilmagico@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            That would require me to buy an iPhone which I won’t do for many many reasons… but ok, maybe Apple Maps is a decent competitor nowadays, good to know.

    • JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      Google search is still a very shitty product right now. In a blind test I would never conclude they are the market leader. It used to work a few years ago though.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Indeed. They started pushing things that make them profit before the things that you’re searching for. They love the revenue stream but are realizing now that it’s also killing their main product: googling.

        But if they’re moving to AI it will probably be the same, trying to guide you into selling something instead of giving what you want. Microsoft too is trying to paper over their os with ads so you know what direction they’re going.

        • JeffreyOrange@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          It’s so exhausting. Google “how to do thing” and it’s just dozens of links to webshops that sell barely related products to your search.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    6 months ago

    This is really funny to me because Google ruined their own search engine for advertising purposes; so much so that they now need to add “AI” to it to look good and hip again. Only if the “AI” results are actually good, it will hurt their advertising revenue, and it’s not quite so simple to tweak it the same way they cooked their search algorithms to serve you more ads, plus it will burn an ungodly amount of money to process each request. And if it’s bad, they’ll have wasted billions on it and will ruin their reputation even worse.

    • Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      And if it’s bad, they’ll have wasted billions on it and will ruin their reputation even worse.

      Ah, the Meta approach! I love to see it!

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      It will not hurt their revenue. There’s no way any of these companies haven’t thought about how to increase revenue with what they’re doing.

      Just because we haven’t seen how yet, doesn’t mean it isn’t planned.

      And it will not cost an “ungodly amount of money” to process these requests. Ofc Google will cache answers, because alot of what people ask, are the same. Then maybe the info can be updated sometimes, but ofc they won’t do it every time.

        • themurphy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yeah, maybe. I’m just not amazed anymore how they’ll always figure out a way to screw customers over with new kind of ads.

          I just think this will be the same.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    6 months ago

    Nah. It’s not going to be “AI.” It’s going to be YouTube results, followed by Reddit results, followed by “Sponsored” results, followed by AI-written Bot results, then a couple pages of Amazon results and finally, on page 10 or so, a ten-year-old result that’s probably no longer relevant.

    • theparadox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sadly, old Google doesn’t work either thanks to the efforts of SEO and the AI generated garbage.

      The problem with search is that the motives of those being searched aren’t to provide you with the most helpful answer. The motives are to get you to visit their website then stay/click/buy as much as possible. They’ll tailor their content to match whatever algorithm the engine is using.

      That’s why Google’s new plan is to collect all of the information ahead of time and skip the “visit other websites” step. Then you can stay/click/buy on their website as much as possible.

      Seriously though. Just skip all this nonsense, you selfish piece of shit, and open your wallet so the hungry corpos can feast on its contents - they have poor, innocent, starving shareholders to feed… you monster.

  • EnderMB@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    There has never been a better time for someone to swoop in and remake web search. Hell, there are probably dozens of software engineers from Google that have direct experience with search AND were laid off.

    I’m surprised that no one is trying to compete with Google at the weakest point it’s been since going public.

  • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 months ago

    googles search results got so bad in the last few months that i switched to a searXNG instance and couldn’t be happier at the moment. no profit incentive, so i get no-bullshit results. they can keep their SEO-infested AI garbage results.

  • Maxnmy's@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I dislike this AI-first approach because it provides only a small selection of results that are influenced by the phrasing of the query. You can’t just replace paginated results.

  • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    And it can go fuck it self all the way down. I can only think of one good thing to do with Google and that is to de-googlelize yourself.

  • thehatfox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 months ago

    Well it’s a step forward for efficiency at least. Now I can see the LLM generated crap straight it in the search page, rather than having to click through to an automated blogspam page.

    If they are really going all-in on this, it almost feels like Google admitting defeat on search, having now been drown by the (partially self inflicted) deluges of SEO and now “AI”.

  • The Menemen!@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Is this really new? Haven’t they been using soft computing methods since, basically forever?

  • dragontamer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m just gonna plug “Kagi” here.

    Kagi is a paid search engine. Yeah, sucks that we have to pay for good or decent search results, but… as the economic models of the internet change, we need to change with them. I’ve personally lost faith in freemium ad-supported websites in general.