This is ridiclous

  • Mad_Punda@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    25 days ago

    I read someone else musing that they must have thought that keeping it plugged in all the time would be bad, so the made it impossible to use the mouse while plugged in. Seems plausible. I suppose it would degrade the battery? Or the cord drag would be bad?

    • TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      The design forces the user to use it wirelessly. Apple just wants their products to look better, meaning NO CORDS EVER. It’s entirely about aesthetic.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          I think Sun made mice that didn’t work without their metallic mouse pad, that had some sort of grid on it.

          Apple’s problem is in following:

          There are industrial designers, fashion designers, managers and engineers.

          Apple doesn’t have industrial designers. Only fashion designers pretending.

          In a normal company managers consult designers and engineers back and forth, both figuring out some compromise and also asking the other group whether there is a better way.

          Not in Apple. Their designers are clearly superior hierarchically to engineers.

          And in the end their products are of inferior quality (for that price).

          Apple’s idea of how things should look and work, when expressed in words, is absolutely fine! It’s actually wonderful. And perfectly possible, it’s actually the same goal as with industrial ergonomics.

          Except they don’t have the process they need to fulfill that. They only have the PR to pretend.

          • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            24 days ago

            Apparently Logitech does have this out now, so I wonder if they patented the “concept” and it will be another 20 years before anyone can do it. Assuming that someone else didn’t already do it 20 years ago and that patented already ran out.

            • TwanHE@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              24 days ago

              Ive seen one at least 10 years ago already. But that didn’t exactly charge the mouse, instead the mouse relied on always being on the pad to work.

              • Anivia@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                24 days ago

                That’s not true. It charges very slowly, about 12 hours to charge a completely dead battery, but it does charge

                The bigger problem is that it’s expensive af, and since current gen Logitech mice have months of battery life and charge in an hour with the usb cord it’s really pointless.

    • deadcade@lemmy.deadca.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      25 days ago

      “But it looks bad and could be bad for the battery!”

      Every other wireless mouse has it in the front, Apple has no valid reason to leave it at the bottom.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        24 days ago

        The fact that everyone hasn’t taken on this design trend just shows how stupid it is.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          24 days ago

          They also take on stupid design trends, like removing the headphone jack.

          This one is just several degrees more stupid.

          • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            There’s the unsolvable problem - to prevent companies doing stupid things.

            And there’s the solvable problem - have enough competition so that companies doing stupid things would become or remain small.

            Which is why all the stupidity in computer industry in our days is a result of patent laws and protectionism.