• InvaderDJ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    1 year ago

    It is mind boggling to me that in the year 2023 we’re complaining about porn, LGBT existence, and fucking book content. Isn’t this what we were laughing at 20 years ago? About book burnings and how stupid the previous generations were for fearing and banning media that challenged them?

    • half_fiction@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is mind boggling to me that in the year 2023 we’re complaining about porn, LGBT existence, and fucking book content. Isn’t this what we were laughing at 20 years ago?

      It’s easy to forget because of how quickly the cultural zeitgeist shifted when it finally did, but the early 2000s was still very homophobic. Watching pretty much any comedy from that era reminds you of just how common the punchline to jokes was just, “teehee they’re gay.”

      • valkyre09@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the early 2000s it was exceptionally common to hear things referred to as “gay” if they were “bad” in some way. Chandler’s “Dad” in friends is one I look back on and shudder. I understand when boomers say things like “things were different back then, but our ability to reflect and do better is what moves our species forward. Not dig in and scream no!

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think you are missing about whole point of jokes being jokes.

        • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Of course. Humor is never used to other out-groups so they can be treated as less. Gay jokes are just good clean fun. Like racist and misogynist jokes. /s

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      Isn’t this what we were laughing at 20 years ago?

      We were laughing, they were seething and planning.

    • carl_dungeon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      You should watch the documentary show about the duggars and how they’re part of a huge cult that systemically indoctrinates kids, fucks them, and gets them into politics. It’s disgusting. It’s an organized push of quiverfull fundamentalist shit being pushed into law.

  • dlpkl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, let’s get this straight. They’re going to take a bunch of dudes, take away their porn, not teach them sexual health, not tech them about consent, strip abortion rights, make women scared to come forward, teach them it was their fault, and do nothing about police ineptitude/corruption. I’m not even exaggerating when I say that it seems like the GOP wants a generation of rape babies. Banking on their future voting bloc?

    • madcaesar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I had no context and read your comment I’d think you’re describing the Taliban or some other islamofascist government. The GOP has really gone off the deep end.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        The gop has really gone off the deep end

        “You merely adopted the deep end… I was born I it!”

        -The gop

    • grabyourmotherskeys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      When you start talking about consent they get uncomfortable and that’s just a bridge too far. It’s really, really close to accountability, the one thing they hate more than anything else.

  • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wouldn’t it be nice if these clowns stopped trying to legislate away their hangups and instead sought some fucking therapy?

    • TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      A mentally unwell population hyped to chase an overblown issue is easier to control. They’ll let themselves be exploited as long as the moral panic is hijacking their attention, which is why there is always a new one.

  • GustavoM@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone who stood in front of some dude trying to force me to suck his dick (and I fucked off immediately) and getting back assaulted by randoms on the midschool (while dressed) yet I’m still an hetero, biological male…? What the heck is going on? Why on earth I’d start sucking dicks just because I saw some dude naked on screen? That’d be ridiculous, and a demonstration of a severe lack of wit and common sense. That is like, staring at my own cock would make me gay or something amongst those lines.

  • Stinkywinks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Dumb af and would never happen. I’m sure the porn industry has enough money to buy off politicians.

  • hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Look you can call me any name in the book. The current where children can easily form para social relationships with what are essentially pornstars and it’s extremely easy for teenagers to become sex workers isn’t healthy.

    I’m not saying Hawley is right but there needs to be some real effort to address this.

  • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Uhhh, porn is definitely addictive… not against banning or removing it, but…

    • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Addictive” means so many different things to different people at this point, it’s become useless. If you can compare the erotic materials I share with my spouse to heroin with a straight face, I’m not the one with a problem.

      • OceanSoap@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lol, you jump straight up to haroin? Just because you and your wife have a healthy relationship with porn doesn’t mean it can’t be addictive to other people. If someone has physical withdrawal symptoms from not consuming the thing, it’s an addiction.

        Like, caffeine is highly addictive, but you wouldn’t compare that with haroin.

        • PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I absolutely would compare caffeine with heroin when making the point that the term “addiction” has become so broad as to be meaningless.

  • 30mag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a mass panic attack over manufactured or overblown fears. But this isn’t going to stop far-right politicians and their allies from capitalizing on this fear.

    Bold statement from a guy publishing an article speculating about how the GOP will suspend the first amendment.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Weak statement about the party that is LITERALLY banning books and writing laws against teachers discussing objective historical fact in classrooms across the country.

      Not to mention the main point you’d ignored/missed while skimming the headline, which is that pornography is first amendment protected speech according to the law and the gop have been actively working to ban it, as a pillar of their party, for over 50 years at this point.

      • 30mag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        pornography is first amendment protected speech according to the law and the gop have been actively working to ban it, as a pillar of their party, for over 50 years at this point.

        Politicians have been fighting the “moral decay” of society for longer than 50 years, and neither party has had a monopoly on trying to legislate their view of morality.

        How close do you think we are to successfully banning pornography in the United States, timeframe-wise?

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    85
    ·
    1 year ago

    Being a European, I am seeing extremists of both sides picking at each other.

    No normal people left anymore?

    • CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US doesn’t have a left wing party. We have a extreme right wing party, and a center right wing party. This both sides shit is stupid as fuck. “We want to ban gays” is extreme. “We want gay people to have rights” is not

      • DharkStare@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        56
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I saw a comment on another post by a European explaining American politics to another European.

        “Their left is our right, their right is our far right, and their far right are literal flag waving Nazis.”

    • ArghZombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I guess if you’re mostly happy with how something is then you’ve no reason to bring it up.

      Nobody is writing long articles, posting tweets or appearing on TV shows to talk about it being quite nice that they can currently go and buy a beer from a shop. But someone could easily decide that they want to rile people up about the easiness of buying beer. And it all goes from there.

    • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lots of them, but normal doesn’t sell advertisements or make headlines. I see by the downvotes (or whatever Lemmy calls them) that you’ve been visited by the Reddit groupthink. It feels weird when it happens. Some of us just want everyone to get along…which feels radical in its own way.

      • Forty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Groupthink my ass. How about it’s not some idiot conspiracy and he’s just straight up wrong? Tough, I know.