• Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    159
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Whatever happens on my browser is client side, which is hardware and software I own. I can make what I own do what I want. It’s a right.

    It’s like Google saying that I can’t skim a magazine in my home, and that I must read the ads. Google can do what they want server-side, and I’ll do what I want client-side.

    • FMT99@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re not saying you can’t have an adblocker. They’re saying their software will try not to serve you their data if you do, or at least make it inconvenient.

      You have a right to your computer. You do not have a right to their service.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And as a service provider, they can choose to degrade your experience. It goes both ways.

      • Chickenstalker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except they want to send you videos. The power is with you, the viewer. Without you, advertisers will have no reason for buying ads. Google can’t collect your data either. Realise that you have this power. Youtube is not like electricity or clean water. We can live without it if push comes to the shove.

        • ElectroNeutrino@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 year ago

          To be fair, what they want is to make money off of you, be it through metadata or through advertising. It’s just that sending you videos happens to be the model which they use to get the metadata or advertising income.

          • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            If they wanted to make money off of me then they should have kept the Pixel Pass as a thing so I’d have a reason to have YT premium

            Or make YT premium worth it

            But nah, they’d rather ruin the product I was paying for, so now they get nothing. At least then I’m not paying for it to get worse

    • gosling@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Let’s just hope they don’t start injecting their ads into the video stream itself

  • EdyBolos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck Google and YouTube, but the title is misleading, and it’s an article from three weeks ago. I’m quite surprised that this post is so upvoted, and nobody else flagged this before.

    • Imhotep@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I just read the article and I don’t see how it’s misleading. Google introduced a delay before video starts for adblock users

    • voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Genuine question (because I’m looking too): without YouTube, where would you go to watch all the diverse videos they host? It’s a really difficult business model. Look at how expensive Floatplane is to the user. Luke and Linus have talked about how difficult it is to run on WAN Show, too: https://youtube.com/watch?v=1mZrsunukUA

      A fediverse platform would almost definitely be a worse experience in terms of speed and video quality because residential internet (at least in the majority of the US) just doesn’t have the upload to support multiple HD video streams. Therefore, it’s not really possible to host at home; a basic server at Hetzner could probably do a dozen or two direct streams with no conversion, but storage is kind of expensive just because there’s so much content, and then there’s the need for moderation, high uptime, security, “good” UX design…

      Then of course on top of all that when you don’t have creators getting paid by ad revenue, fewer will be able to spend the time on production quality because they’ll be doing it after work, so the length and/or quality suffers.

      I dunno dude, I really hope someone smarter than me has figured this out, but it’s a tough problem.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You are correct. Fundamentally, it’s the hosting and storage issue that’s the crux of all this.

        And the only choices available are another corporation hosting and paying/passing on the cost, or all of us hosting on a peer-to-peer network, which will be slow, but doable.

        Having said that, the peer hosting method would work though, and shouldn’t be dismissed out of hand. We just shouldn’t expect the same level of service we do from YouTube or any corporation hosting videos.

        • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean torrenting works but i’ll be damned if I’d need to wait for the buffer to fill up every 30sec for the 1440p video.
          You’d need multiple versions pre-encoded to reduce network transfer and serverside transcoding.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean torrenting works but i’ll be damned if I’d need to wait for the buffer to fill up every 30sec for the 1440p video. You’d need multiple versions pre-encoded to reduce network transfer and serverside transcoding.

            It would definately be a slog to watch, vs a service that can just deliver the video to you in real time on demand.

            My only point is that you would be able to watch the video, after the slog, so that avenue should not be discounted as an option. Its not a great option, but still, an option.

    • TangledHyphae@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Interesting, it came up in news feeds on other sites. I’ll check more in the future, that’s the first time I’ve had that happen.

  • The Uncanny Observer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Are they, though? I’ve been using Firefox and uBlock Origin for years and I’ve not had an issue other than needing to manually update my filters three times since this started.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah, however “worse” it is for adblock users, it can’t compare to how awful the ads are.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’d be surprised how sensitive normies are regarding 3 additional clicks.
        For us tech literate folks it’s a regular sunday but they are literally raging internally if they need another 5 clicks more than usual.

    • Frellwit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      By doing that you’re wasting bandwidth on all the CDNs that hosts ALL your filter lists. Updating the Quick fixes list should be enough. (Which updates every 5 hours automatically on uBO 1.54).

      How to manually update Quick Fixes (Manual updates push back automatic updates.)

      • Click 🛡️ uBO’s icon
      • the ⚙ Dashboard button
      • the Filter lists pane
      • the 🕘 clock icon next to the uBlock filters – Quick fixes list
      • the 🔃 Update now button.
    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure what the hell is going on at YouTube but I’ve noticed a significant drop in decent videos being recommended, and a huge uptick in videos I’ve already seen showing up at the front of the feed. Probs gonna drop it when the price picks up and just go to nebula.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly: I’d rather pay for YT and pirate Netflix.
        The amount of Entertainment I get from YT exceeds the scale of Netflix and I use it daily at 2-3h per day.

        And while yes, it’s free, I can also support the creators with a better click price than a regular click.
        Is it a better solution then the respective patreon/whatever? Nope
        Do I want to pay 5€/month or video each time? Fuck no. I am not king Midas.

        • wishthane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yup, that’s how I see it too. I don’t like seeing ads, the creators do at least get more money, and the actual value I get out of YouTube is pretty high

        • FehrIsFair@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Not to mention not every creator will have a patreon anyway so this covers that scenario as well.

      • grayman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a ton of educational content only on YT and so it’s a part of our homeschool curriculum. My kids were getting a lot of super inappropriate ads a while back, so I got premium to avoid all ads.

        • auf@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How’s that different from purchasing YouTube Premium?

            • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              was an obvious attempt at humour

              One thing I’ve learned from my time here on Lemmy, never assume anything when you’re replying, be explicit, even bordering on legalese, when discussing with someone else here.

              People and conflict bots will nitpick the fact of things not said and use it against you.

              At the very least conclude your subtle joke comment with a “/s”, the universal signal for “please don’t yell at me, I was just joking around”.

              • auf@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Is lemmy your first social media ever to use? Random people on the Internet don’t get jokes or even worse, they intentionally ignore it

                • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Is lemmy your first social media ever to use?

                  The level of true insightfulness of your reply comment is so incredibly powerful and accurate (and wise!), that its hardly readable by a normal human being. /s

                  Random people on the Internet don’t get jokes or even worse, they intentionally ignore it

                  Well, its random, so that means some do ignore them, and others do not. /shrug

                  (Just being playful, but in the future, you may want to click on a user’s name and see their posting history, before declaring them a novice of forums.)

    • sw2de3fr4gt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Open your videos in Incognito mode, the block is cookie-based. I open YT on my browser in normal mode to see all my subscriptions, then open the videos in incognito with adblock enabled.

  • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Still using Vivaldi with only the built-in ad blocking, still noticing no ads, still noticing zero performance issues.

    • Orionza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I use Vivaldi. I’ve been getting the ads mostly. I have to open YouTube in a private window and view from there. Do you have Unblock with scripts? My scripts only worked for awhile. The built in adblocking is just not working for me.

      • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s just a regular install with “block trackers and ads” enabled. The only YouTube related plugins/extensions I have are tube buddy and dearrow to remove clickbait thumbnails. I don’t use unlock, ad block, or anything like that.

  • Konala Koala@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have LIbreWolf with uBlock Origin and NoScript (and Redirector I can turn on to redirect me from watching videos on YouTube.com to YewTu.be on a moments notice of something funky going on with YouTube), and so far, I have not noticed any ads or anything for a long time. I’m probably at the point of beginning to wonder what a YouTube Ad is.

  • ohlaph@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The official YouTube app is slso terrible, so maybe it’s their excuse for terrible products?