I guess this is probably going to be the new shitty norm with bait and switch for reviews then nickel and dime afterwards.

  • B0NK3RS@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    9 months ago

    Adding micro transactions after release is bullshit. There should be rules where it needs to be in from release or not.

    • Bonesince1997@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Right. Some people wouldn’t bother with a game at all if they knew there would be this. It’s very deceptive.

    • caut_R@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 months ago

      Wait until the reviews are out so people can‘t be warned, and the product can’t be dunked on and then…

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      TF2?

      but tbf that basically invented the lootbox which then made TF2 free to play

      • Soggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        TF2 was a better experience before it went free-to-play. I want a barrier that keeps the hordes of clueless children out.

        • B0NK3RS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          TF2 before F2P was one of, if not the, best multiplayer games. It just wasn’t the same after that and good community servers died out.

    • okamiueru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If they place something behind MTs, then I completely agree. But, if they want to add more cosmetics that don’t exist yet, and they finance it MTs, and at a fair price, it’s less unethical.

      Announcing it after reviews… Hm. Sketchy at best.

  • hatsa122@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    Divided? One must be pretty naive if they can’t see the move they are trying to pull here.

    Can’t wait for f2p Project L to break into the genre and become the biggest and most popular fighting game.

    • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I mean you’ve got people who are defending Bilzzard’s newest horse armor bullshit so yeah.

      ETA: Yup, got quite a few Hardcore Gamers^TM in the thread defending this BS already with ‘it’s just cosmetics’, all fighting games do it, or won’t someone think of the devs, like like they think the developers are getting a cut off the money.

      Just sad frogs sitting in the boiling water.

      • caut_R@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah, you can find vocal people who will play the apologist for just about anything, it‘s baffling to the degree that I wonder if there‘s paid actors on social media in this sense

        • harry_balzac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Definitely paid actors. These companies all have social media teams. It’s not improbable that they create fake personal accounts to post apologist bs.

          They also can buy sock puppet accounts and use those.

    • PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Project L will not use LoL but Valorant as base.

      Riot is a fan of fomo and high pricess.

    • BigFig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Can’t wait for F2P game from the company probably MOST known for in game shops??

    • Zonetrooper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Gaming “journalism” can’t afford outright say “company deliberately tries to hide enshittification of their game” aloud. Might lose that access to selective early copies for review!

  • Cossty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    What do you mean “new shitty norm”? Companies have been doing that for years already. First time I saw it around 2017 I think. I not sure about the game, but I think it was Call of Duty.

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      From what i gather, they waited until after the reviews were in. They got a good score, which i guess would have been impacted by the inclusion of microtransactions, and released them after the reviews were in. Sounds like they were trying to avoid the bad press they would have gotten for including them (or perhaps purchases even, from people starkly against the practice)

  • Vipsu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I wish more players would just ignore these cosmetic microtransactions and go with the default skin or at least limit themselves to ones that can be obtained by actually achieving something in the game. Using default skin while outplaying people in competitive games could probably induce some people to make quite salty comments.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    It already was, activision and capcom both did that, and no, cheat DLCs aren’t accessibility, cheats should be free like they were back in the ps2 days and earlier.

  • Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    Same argument every time. I don’t give a shit, nor will I ever give a shit, if the only micro transactions are skins. It does not affect gameplay, it only adds a little way to customize for the enthusiasts. That’s fine, and has been a regular Tekken feature since PS3. Why people care so much is beyond me.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t give a shit, nor will I ever give a shit

      Yes, you do. If you truly didn’t care, you would have no incentive to even comment at all.

      Why people care so much is beyond me.

      Namco cares. That’s why they had hidden the feature from the launch version.