• BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    161
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is a net win. Now they won’t be recommended to everyone trying to do hardware comparisons. The bias in their results has pretty much made them worthless as a source since Ryzen released.

  • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Aren’t these the people that straight up manipulated data to make AMD look worse than Intel or something wild?

  • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Aren’t these the same guys that have a stick up their ass about AMD and/or they get paid by Intel to be biased?

  • AtmaJnana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I know the admins have unquestionable integrity (they certainly pretend as much) so surely they are going to retroactively pay every user who contributed their benchmarks for free. Right? When should I expect my first royalty check?

    • GladiusB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      That don’t actually work. My system can tell what memory I have, but you can’t? Fuck that website

      • aidan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        My system can tell what memory I have, but you can’t?

        Wait, I’m confused about this. Are you upset the site can’t tell what RAM you have. Because I’m pretty certain there is no way a site could tell that.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Of all the things to try and monetize with a subscription…

    Who’s more brain damaged, the site owner or the people that actually pay for it?

  • just_change_it@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    YAY FREE ADVERTISEMENT LETS GO LOSERBENCHMARK!!!11111

    In all seriousness, these guys are ONLY the top google result because of all the “controversy.” They do it for a reason. Every time i’ve seen a thread talking about them i’ve literally downvoted it because the only way to stop the cycle is to just let them die a slow death which as far as I can tell is never going to happen. Their business model is better than anybody talking about them, posting about them, or generating ad revenue from making articles about them. We’re the clowns.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 months ago

    Uh, I used it two times in the past, am shocked reading the replies here lol, where can I compare two cpus then?

  • banneryear1868@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That was the only reason to use the site lol other paid options are way better. All userbenchmarks was good for was giving you a rough idea that your hardware was performing as it was expected to.

  • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    It was kind of shitty but it was also useful for making sure that you didn’t have some sort of configuration error that was negatively affecting performance. I’m sure they’ll be replaced by something else though.