• fpslem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    tab grouping

    Sure, okay.

    vertical tabs

    To each their own.

    profile management

    Whatever, it’s fine.

    and local AI features

    HOLLUP

    • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      91
      ·
      6 months ago

      We’re looking at how we can use local, on-device AI models – i.e., more private – to enhance your browsing experience further. One feature we’re starting with next quarter is AI-generated alt-text for images inserted into PDFs, which makes it more accessible to visually impaired users and people with learning disabilities. The alt text is then processed on your device and saved locally instead of cloud services, ensuring that enhancements like these are done with your privacy in mind.

      IMO if everything’s going to have AI ham fisted into it, this is probably the least shitty way to do so. With Firefox being open source, the code can also be audited to ensure they’re actually keeping their word about it being local-only.

      • PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Don’t you need specific CPUs for these AI features? If so, how is this going to work on the machines that don’t support it?

        • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          6 months ago

          With it being local it’s probably a small and limited model. I took a couple courses on machine learning years ago (before it got rebranded as “AI”), and you’d be surprised at how well a basic image recognition model can run on the lowest-spec macbook from 2012.

        • space@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          Running AI models isn’t that resource intensive. Training the models is the difficult part.

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I wonder when tech companies are going to start calling AI something different to deal with the luddites. Like skyscrapers whose floors are labeled 12 and 14.

  • ClamDrinker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    If you’re here because of the AI headline, this is important to read.

    We’re looking at how we can use local, on-device AI models – i.e., more private – to enhance your browsing experience further. One feature we’re starting with next quarter is AI-generated alt-text for images inserted into PDFs, which makes it more accessible to visually impaired users and people with learning disabilities.

    They are implementing AI how it should be. Don’t let all the shitty companies blind you to the fact what we call AI has positive sides.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      They are implementing AI how it should be.

      The term is so overused and abused that I’m not clear what they’re even promising. Are they localizing a LLM? Are they providing some kind of very fancy macroing? Are they linking up with ChatGPT somehow or integrating with Co-pilot? There’s no way to tell from the verbage.

      And that’s not even really Mozilla’s fault. It’s just how the term AI can mean anything from “overhyped javascript” to “multi-billion dollar datacenter full of fake Scarlett Johansson voice patterns”.

      • chrash0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        there are language models that are quite feasible to run locally for easier tasks like this. “local” rules out both ChatGPT and Co-pilot since those models are enormous. AI generally means machine learned neural networks these days, even if a pile of if-else used to pass in the past.

        not sure how they’re going to handle low-resource machines, but as far as AI integrations go this one is rather tame

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          AI generally means machine learned neural networks these days

          Right, but a neural network traditionally rules out using a single local machine. Hell, we have entire chip architecture that revolves around neural net optimization. I can’t imagine needing that kind of configuration for my internet browser.

          not sure how they’re going to handle low-resource machines

          One of the perks of Firefox is its relative thinness. Chrome was a shameless resource hog even in its best days, and IE wasn’t any better. Do I really want Firefox chewing hundreds of MB of memory so it can… what? Simulate a 600 processor cluster doing weird finger art?

          • chrash0@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 months ago

            i mean, i’ve worked in neural networks for embedded systems, and it’s definitely possible. i share you skepticism about overhead, but i’ll eat my shoes if it isn’t opt in

    • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      We’re also using machine learning for the local site translation. The AI buzzword is doing more damage than good PR.

    • AusatKeyboardPremi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      There are a lot of knee jerk reactions in the comments. I hope few of those commenters have read the article or, at the least, your comment.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I want fewer built-in features, not more of them. All of these things should be extensions, not built into the browser core.

    I mean, I’d be perfectly happy for said extensions and more to be shipped by default – it would be good for Firefox to come “batteries included” even with adblocking and such, and that’s most likely the way I would use it. But I just want it to be modular and removable as a matter of principle.

    I remember how monolithic Mozilla SeaMonkey got too top-heavy and forced Mozilla to start over more-or-less from scratch with Phoenix Firebird Firefox, and I want it to stick close to those roots so they don’t have to do it again.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The default experience when people Google “install Firefox” should absolutely provide as much feature parity with other major browsers as possible. 99% of users will want them or not mind them. And for that last 1%, I guess I’m not sure if it’s worth the development headaches for them to bake in a configuration change that power users could get by forking the codebase anyway.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Something like a deeper integration of an addOn/extension would be nice.
      Modularity could be a way to do it.

  • Larry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    Local AI sounds nice. One reason I’m cynical about the current state of AI is because of how many send all your data to another company

  • micka190@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Profile management

    Fucking finally!

    The fact that you had to use external applications or manually go to an internal Firefox menu to change from one to another sucked!

  • jacktherippah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    That’s all fine and good but Firefox on Android is currently in a sorry state. No per-site process isolation, buggy, can’t keep tabs open, slow, choppy, drains battery. Had to uninstall it on my brand new Galaxy S24+ and my Pixel 6 Pro because it was draining so much battery. When are you going to finally stop ignoring Firefox Android, Mozilla?

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I use it on a Pixel 7 Pro. Can’t say I have the same issues.
      I also have a notorious problem with too many tabs (I am beyond 99)

    • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Same. I had to uninstall due to the battery drain issues. Pixel 6 Pro. Battery life is not something I am willing to compromise on.

  • Kokesh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I hope it won’t end up like Chrome. Suddenly my tabs were opening in different weird groups and I couldn’t find anything.