• inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Judkins said that after the finger test, a lead cybertruck engineer at Tesla said he did the video wrong.

    The engineer told him the frunk increases in pressure every single time it closes and detects resistance, Judkins said. It’s going to assume you want to close the frunk and maybe something like a bag is getting in the way, which would make it close harder.

    Are you kidding me? You did the test wrong on a safety critical feature? No you dumbass engineer, you designed it wrong. Why in the holy fuck would you make a safety critical algorithm keep applying more pressure on subsequent attempts??? That’s literally the opposite of what you do for safety.

    • MamboGator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      This is why, as a software developer, I’m against designing any system that assumes what the user wants and tries to do it for them automatically. On the occasions where the assumption is right, it’s a mild convenience at best. When it’s wrong, it is always infuriating if not dangerous.

      • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, I’m an embedded software developer myself and yeah, when we architect our code we have safety critical sections identified with software safety reviews and we always go with the assumption that we’re going to run into that one guy who’s the living embodiment of Murphy’s law and go from there with that design to minimize the potential for injury and death.

        Can’t imagine who the hell is in charge of the software safety reviews there that let that pass.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      We deliberately made it fail critical. It’s your fault for expecting fail safe!

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I know I’m old school and all that, but why do people want to pay for automatically closing doors of any kind? Automatic opening of cargo spaces I get, if you have your bags full of hands or whatever, but once you put the stuff in there… Seem like such an incredibly unnecessary and costly feature, that also have a high chance of failing in the future. I don’t get it.

          • CerealKiller01@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I think we’re on two different wavelengths.

            Put stuff in: Stand next to closed car with no free hands, could use automatically opening doors.

            Take stuff out: Open car. Pick up stuff out of the car. Stand next to open car with no free hands, could use automatically closing doors.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Good question. My wife’s RAV4 has a rear door that will only close if you press a button. You can’t close it manually. Furthermore, it’s on the door while it’s open and my five foot tall wife can barely reach it. It’s ridiculous.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            You know, that’s true and it didn’t even occur to me. I guess she just wouldn’t have bought it? (I would have been fine with that, I hate SUVs, even hybrids.)

    • barsquid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why the hell would it close harder if there is something in the way? That’s not the correct behavior for a lid, that’s the correct behavior for powered shears.

  • Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    The crazy part to me is that he tried a carrot and it didn’t open for it. Yet he thought it was a good idea to try his finger which it about the same size.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    A Tesla engineer said the test was done wrong because the frunk increases in pressure every time.

    “You are holding it wrong!” 🤣

      • cley_faye@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’m sure these “engineers” were confused everytime they saw an elevator door not mercilessly crush people.

    • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      He did demonstrate it that way, specifically with a carrot. And it somewhat worked. The problem is they programmed it to do more and more pressure every time it fails meaning that doing the carrot first actually caused a safety issue. He only moved onto his finger because the safety feature seemed to be working.

      • Sanctus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        The engineer told him the frunk increases in pressure every single time it closes and detects resistance, Judkins said. It’s going to assume you want to close the frunk and maybe something like a bag is getting in the way, which would make it close harder.

        Geniuses.

        • toofpic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Because I am the bag commander. If I want the bag to fit, and it doesn’t fit, I’d better crush it!

  • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Oh no I saw a video where it chopped a carrot without stopping

    I don’t have the courage to click the link….

    • EdibleFriend@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      THAT’S THIS!!!

      He went through a bunch of vegetables and, admittedly, it was pretty impressive how it handled them. But then with no hesitation it took off the tip of the carrot and he still decided to try his finger

      • Wispy2891@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        So that’s incredibly stupid, lol if it crushes and cuts a carrot why couldn’t do it with a finger

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I saw my first cybertruck in person the other day. It looks incredibly dumb in promotional photos, but it’s astonishing how much stupider it looks in traffic surrounded by normal vehicles.

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Are there any crashes already involving pedestrians? I really wonder how broken those pedestrians are after the hit. I think the chance to survive a hit from a Cybertruck is minimal.

    And I am even surprised that it is allowed on your streets.

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      To be fair, the survivability of being hit by any big US pickup is pretty small. Perhaps the cybertruck is even worse though.

      Pickups are explicitly exempted from a lot of crash/pedestrian safety laws in the US (I think related to them being classed as commercial vehicles), despite every other car on the road there being a pickup.

    • riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Murica, vehicles with sharp edges and assault rifles at walmart is where freedom is at.

  • puppy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s going to assume you want to close the frunk and maybe something like a bag is getting in the way, which would make it close harder.

    What’s next? When you press the brake padel the car is going to assume that you want to slow down? Wow, that’s some fantastic wisdom from Tesla!

    • Evotech@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I think frunk is a good word. What would you call a trunk that is in the front of the car.

      • Lobreeze@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        A normal trunk in the back isn’t a “bunk”.

        Why is frunk a good name for the front? It’s silly.

        • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Well traditionally, cars only had one trunk, now it is common that they have two. The need arose to distinguish them, and ‘front trunk’ easily collapses into a nice single syllable portmanteau that makes communication simple and concise; the language evolves and a new word is born.

  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    What person with an automated cargo door closure mechanism has thought “stop protecting my stuff and just fucking close”?

    I’ll admit it annoys me when there’s something in the way that keeps my door from latching and it reopens, but I’d rather have to clear the door and shut it manually than it force itself closed and jams the door or break my shit.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Its just like elevators, really. You put your hand in to stop the doors closing, they open again before touching your arm. Next time they close gently on your arm. Third time, the doors snap shut and the elevator ascends without further warning, resulting in traumatic amputation.

      • reinei@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Wait what? Are there actually elevators “programmed” this way‽ (can this behavior even be changed in the controller?)

        Because I have never “tested” this behavior per se (I mean you mostly want your elevator to move anyway so you ideally remove the obstruction the first time it didn’t fully close…)

        • erwan@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’ve seen cases where it takes some time to the group of people in the elevator to figure out the obstruction. Because it won’t even touch the object, just reopen again and again.

          So no, elevators don’t do that, and I assume the parent comment is sarcastic.

  • Bonesy91@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is sad. The cybertruck is a deathtrap on wheels and somehow “money” got it to pass any “money” to safety tests is beyond me…

    • Reddfugee42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      somehow “money” got it to pass any “money” to safety tests is beyond me…

      This sentence brought to you by Stroke™️. Have you had a stroke lately?™️